Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
