Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ), 2500D, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10426-250
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €163.20
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500D
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Shimano TLD II A, 50 II LRSA, right hand, 2-speed multi-roll, Lever Drag, TLD50IILRSA
Shimano TLD II A
Multireels
88.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.5:1 / 1.4:1
Maximum drag42kg / 92.59lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelMultireels
  • Price range~ €285.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size50 II LRSA
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeLever drag
  • Handle orientationRight
  • Line capacity monofil-

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX and Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX offers a weight of 195g / 6,88oz, while Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 96 centimeter / 37.8 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano TLD II A?

There are not much differences between the two comparables