Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (8.54 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Sahara 500 FI?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano Stradic FM vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X
