Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X
