Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Cardiff 401A
Multireels
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.24 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight337g / 11.89oz
Line retireve per crank56cm / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €95.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size401
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm-325m / 0.35mm-270m / 0.40mm-215m 12lb-330yds / 14lb-250yds / 20lb-165yds
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 401A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and durability (8.58 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 401A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Cardiff 401A?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX
