Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX edges out Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) and the weight (230g / 8,11oz). Still, Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 19kg / 41.89 lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX
