Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch). While Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Penn Slammer IV?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Penn Battle III 3000X
