Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX
