Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Beastmaster
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Beastmaster
Multireels
81.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1485g / 52.38oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings14
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,149.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/650
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX edges out Shimano Beastmaster with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (6.2:1). Still, Shimano Beastmaster holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Beastmaster?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX
