Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ), 4000D-CXH, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10426-401
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €175.50
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000D-CXH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Shimano Ocea Jigger, 2000 NR PG, right hand, Jigging Saltwater Fishing Reel, Star Drag, OCEAJG2000NRPG
Shimano Ocea Jigger
Multireels
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.81 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9.9kg / 21,83lbs
Weight595g / 20.99oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings9

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelMultireels
  • Price range~ €453.50
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2000 NR PG
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeStar drag
  • Handle orientationRight
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.61/310

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX and Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Ocea Jigger?

There are not much differences between the two comparables