Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/200
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.44 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX
