Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa Tanacom 750
Multireels
77.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight1260g / 44.45oz
Line retireve per crank42 centimeter / 16.54 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €511.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/700
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX and Daiwa Tanacom 750 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX offers a weight of 150g / 5,29oz, while Daiwa Tanacom 750 stands out for a maximum drag of 20kg / 44,09lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Daiwa Tanacom 750?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- The 5.67 out of 10 (4.9:1) gear ratio gives you the power you need to handle heavy lures and strong large fish out of cover
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9 out of 10 (150g / 5,29oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
Daiwa Tanacom 750
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX
