Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
88.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €668.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X offers a weight of 160g / 5,64oz, while Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A stands out for a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
