Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank85 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €673.66
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX clearly outshines Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.7:1) and weight (175g / 6,17oz). While Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X
