Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €673.66
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC
