Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX offers a weight of 200g / 7,05oz, while Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD stands out for a ball bearings of 4. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
