Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Exsence
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €421.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 MXGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/110

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX clearly outshines Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and weight (220g / 7,76oz). While Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Exsence and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
