Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Delphin FRIZ vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
