Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X
