Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
