Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa BG 6500X

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa BG
Spinning
66.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight835g / 29.45oz
Line retireve per crank123 centimeter / 48.43 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €128.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.45/340
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX clearly outshines Daiwa BG 6500X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and weight (170g / 6oz). While Daiwa BG 6500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Daiwa BG?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa BG 6500X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
