Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/200
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX
