Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/200
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X
