Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX edges out Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.7:1) and the weight (170g / 6oz). Still, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch and a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Aero 4000X
