Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Exist LT

Spinning

95.00 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.43 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight170g / 6oz

Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch

Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €642.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizePC 2500D
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)

Multireels

86.00 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics3.8 out of 10

Gear ratio3.58:1

Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs

Weight800g / 28219oz

Line retireve per crank55 centimeter / 21654 inch

Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelMultireels
Price range~ €599.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size-
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeStar drag
Handle orientationRight
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/500

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX and Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX offers a weight of 170g / 6oz, while Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) stands out for a ball bearings of 8. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)?

Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX

With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles