Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
63.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX
