Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT, 2500-XH, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10609-250
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
78.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €96.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500-XH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD, 25QD, left and right hand, Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10924-025
Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
Feeder And Match
90.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.51 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight455g / 16.05oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings7

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €312.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size25
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD edges out Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.51 out of 10) and the total score (9.07 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 205g / 7,23oz and a gear ratio of 6.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD?

There are not much differences between the two comparables