Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Shimano Sedona 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Sedona 500 FI and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
