Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X
