Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Shimano Sahara FJ

Spinning

65.00 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.12 out of 10

Gear ratio5.0:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight265g / 9.35oz

Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch

Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €63.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC 3000 DH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Daiwa 22 Exist LT

Spinning

84.40 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.5 out of 10

Gear ratio4.9:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight150g / 5.29oz

Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch

Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €635.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000D-P
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX edges out Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.44 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4+1 and a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Shimano Sahara FJ and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?

Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX

When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency