Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and the gear ratio (5.3:1). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
