Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT

Spinning

72.60 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability3.74 out of 10

Ergonomics6.2 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight240g / 8.47oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €98.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano AERO XR

Feeder And Match

81.00 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.2 out of 10

Gear ratio5

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight210g / 7.41oz

Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch

Ball bearings5+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelFeeder and match
Price range~ €114.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC3000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX and Shimano AERO XR C3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX offers a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch, while Shimano AERO XR C3000X stands out for a total score of 8.1 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.