Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX edges out Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a gear ratio of 5.8:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
