Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Delphin INKS 6000X

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and line retrieve per crank (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Delphin INKS?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Delphin FRIZ


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX
