Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT

Spinning

80.00 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.66 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.8:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €199.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000 S-H
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Penn Battle III

Spinning

69.60 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.5 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio5.3:1

Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs

Weight785g / 27.7oz

Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €127.60
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size8000 HS
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX edges out Penn Battle III 8000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (175g / 6,17oz) and the line retrieve per crank (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch). Still, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 8.5 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 13,6kg / 29,98lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Penn Battle III?

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX

With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles