Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT

Spinning

80.00 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.66 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.8:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €199.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000 S-H
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Shimano Sedona FJ 500

Spinning

500x

60.50 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.43 out of 10

Gear ratio5.6:1

Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs

Weight170g / 6oz

Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch

Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €52.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/110

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX edges out Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the total score (8 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch). Still, Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X holds its own with strengths like a durability of 7 out of 10 and a weight of 170g / 6oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Shimano Sedona FJ 500?

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX

When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles