Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX
