Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Penn International VISW
Multireels
67.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.68 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.1:1/1.4:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight1590g / 56.09oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €559.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/1270
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX edges out Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (195g / 6,88oz) and the gear ratio (6.2:1). Still, Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 104 centimeter / 40.94 inch and a durability of 5.68 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Penn International VISW?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
