Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
94.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €743.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/240
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX and Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT and Shimano 20 Stella?
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX
