Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT
Spinning
88.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €478.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9 out of 10 (150g / 5,29oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X
