Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
69.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €84.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in weight (175g / 6,17oz) and durability (7.67 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X
