Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight159g / 5.61oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €85.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/270
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
