Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
87.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500SHGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.8:1) and weight (210g / 7,41oz). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano Twin Power FE and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX
