Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and gear ratio (5.3:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX
