Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Delphin INKS 4000X

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Delphin INKS
Spinning
56.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/470
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX and Delphin INKS 4000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Delphin INKS 4000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Delphin INKS?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin INKS 4000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X
