Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €99.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
