Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
65.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €57.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeLT5000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 7 and a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 NINJA LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A
