Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Sargus II Spinning
Spinning
2500x
64.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235

Shimano Cardiff 401A
Multireels
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.24 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight337g / 11.89oz
Line retireve per crank56cm / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €95.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size401
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm-325m / 0.35mm-270m / 0.40mm-215m 12lb-330yds / 14lb-250yds / 20lb-165yds
Conclusion
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 401A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch). While Shimano Cardiff 401A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Sargus II Spinning and Shimano Cardiff 401A?
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX
