Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
55.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight365g / 12.88oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €59.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeLT6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.54 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight138g / 4.87oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x clearly outshines Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (138g / 4,87oz). While Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 NINJA LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X
- 8.7 out of 10 (92 centimeter / 36.22 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9.08 out of 10 (138g / 4,87oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X
