Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €61.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 M HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 125/0.13
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX clearly outshines Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT and Shimano Stella FK?
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX
