Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT, 6000SS, left and right hand, Match And Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10217-605
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
62.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.62 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight390g / 13.76oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €75.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size6000SS
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Shimano Sedona  2500 SFI, Spinning reel with front drag
Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI
Spinning
52.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82 lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank73cm / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €52.80
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500 SFI
  • Handle typeHandle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofil0.16mm-150m / 0.18mm-120m / 0.20mm-95m

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX and Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI stands out for a weight of 245g / 8.64oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT and Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI?

There are not much differences between the two comparables