Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
62.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X and Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X offers a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 Revros LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX
