Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
62.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 230g / 8,11oz and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 Revros LT and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX
